U.S. flag An official website of the United States government
  1. Home
  2. For Industry
  3. Color Additives
  4. Color Additives in Specific Products
  5. In Medical Devices
  6. FDA Public Health Advisory: Subject: Reports of Blue Discoloration and Death in Patients Receiving Enteral Feedings Tinted With The Dye, FD&C Blue No. 1
  1. In Medical Devices

FDA Public Health Advisory: Subject: Reports of Blue Discoloration and Death in Patients Receiving Enteral Feedings Tinted With The Dye, FD&C Blue No. 1

September 29, 2003 

Dear Health Care Professional:

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) would like you to be aware of several reports of toxicity, including death, temporally associated with the use of FD&C Blue No. 1 (Blue 1) in enteral feeding solutions. In these reports, Blue 1 was intended to help in the detection and/or monitoring of pulmonary aspiration in patients being fed by an enteral feeding tube. Reported episodes were manifested by blue discoloration of the skin, urine, feces, or serum and some were associated with serious complications such as refractory hypotension, metabolic acidosis and death. Case reports indicate that seriously ill patients, particularly those with a likely increase in gut permeability (e.g., patients with sepsis), may be at greater risk for these complications. Because these events were reported voluntarily from a population of unknown size, it is not possible to establish the incidence of these episodes.

A causal relationship between systemic absorption of Blue 1 and the reported serious and life-threatening patient outcomes (including death) has not been definitively established. Indeed, it would be very difficult to establish a clear, causal relationship in the setting of complex medical issues often seen in patients receiving feedings via enteral tubes. However, in vitro evidence that Blue 1 can be a mitochondrial toxin lends plausibility to the idea that Blue 1 could cause these kinds of serious adverse effects if significant or persistent serum levels of the dye were to occur. From the reports, it appears that neither the concentration nor the total amount of Blue 1 used in the enteral feeding solutions was unusually high compared to other patients in whom no toxicity was observed. Thus, if there is a causal relationship between the dye and the serious outcomes, there could be underlying patient-related factor(s) that allow significant absorption of Blue 1 in some enterally fed patients.

While we are not able at this time to establish a cause-and-effect relationship between the reported serious and life-threatening patient outcomes and the use of the dye, nonetheless, given the seriousness of the potential complications, we believe health care professionals should be notified of these reports.

As background, FD&C Blue No. 1 is a water-soluble dye allowed by the FDA for use in foods, drugs and cosmetics, based on numerous studies in animals. Data from life-exposure animal studies supports an ADI (acceptable daily intake) of Blue 1 of 12.0 milligrams/kilogram body weight/day. The dye is batch certified by the FDA and is widely used in food products (candies, confections, beverages, etc.) in amounts consistent with good manufacturing practices (generally at parts per million). There have been no reports of toxicity associated with this general use. Toxicity has been reported only in association with Blue 1 tinting of enteral feedings, intended as a means of visually detecting pulmonary aspiration. This use, although a common practice for nearly 30 years, has never been evaluated by the FDA for safety or utility (i.e., there has been no evaluation by the FDA of the sensitivity and specificity of its use in this manner).

SUMMARY OF REPORTS

  • As of September, 2003, the FDA is aware of 20 cases from the scientific literature or in FDA post-marketing adverse event reports associating the use of blue dye in tube feedings with blue discoloration of body fluids and skin, as well as more serious complications. There have been 12 reported deaths and one case with an unknown outcome.
  • In more than 75% of all reported cases, patients had a reported history of sepsis (and therefore likely altered gut permeability) before or during systemic absorption of Blue 1.
  • Time of onset of toxicity from first use of Blue 1 varied from several hours to 20 days of continuous use in enteral feedings.

At this time, the FDA believes practitioners should be aware of the following points:

  • Use of Blue 1-tinted enteral feedings for detecting aspiration has been associated with several serious adverse events, including death, although a direct causal relationship has not been definitely established.
  • The safety of Blue 1-tinted enteral feedings for detecting aspiration has not been documented.
  • Based on the reports received to date, patients at risk for increased intestinal permeability, which includes those with sepsis, burns, trauma, shock, surgical interventions, renal failure, celiac sprue, or inflammatory bowel disease, appear to be at increased risk of absorbing Blue 1 from tinted enteral feedings.
  • In addition to the possibility of systemic toxicity, Blue 1-tinted enteral feedings may interfere with diagnostic stool examinations, such as the hemoccult test.
  • Other blue dyes, such as methylene blue and FD&C Blue No. 2, may have similar if not greater toxicity potential than Blue 1 and would not be appropriate replacements.

The FDA will continue to closely monitor reports for additional events. We encourage all health professionals to report any serious adverse events occurring with Blue 1-tinted enteral feedings to the FDA's MedWatch program at 1-800-FDA-1088 tel, 1-800-FDA-0178 fax, or online at http://www.fda.gov/medwatch/. Additional information on color additives, in general, may be accessed at http://www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/col-toc.html

Sincerely yours,

David W. K. Acheson, MD
Chief Medical Officer
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition
Food and Drug Administration


References

  1. Systemic absorption of food dye in patients with sepsis. Maloney JP, Halbower AC, Fouty BF, Fagan KA, Balasubramaniam V, Pike AW, Fennessey PV, Moss M. N Engl J Med 2000 Oct 5;343(14):1047-8
  2. Food Dye Use in Enteral Feedings: A Review and a Call for a Moratorium. Maloney JP, Ryan TA, Brasel KJ, Binion DG, Johnson DR, Halbower AC, Frankel EH, Nyffeler M, Moss M. Nutrition in Clinical Practice 2002 Jun 17: 168-181
  3. Risk factors for aspiration. Metheny NA. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2002 Nov-Dec;26(6 Suppl):S26-31; discussionS32-3
  4. North American Summit on Aspiration in the Critically Ill Patient: consensus statement.McClave SA, DeMeo MT, DeLegge MH, DiSario JA, Heyland DK, Maloney JP, Metheny NA, Moore FA, Scolapio JS, Spain DA, Zaloga GP. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2002 Nov-Dec;26(6 Suppl):S80-5
  5. Pharmokinetic study of biliary secretion. II. Comparison of excretion behavior in triphenylmethane dyes. Iga T, Awazu S, Nogami H. Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo) 1971, 19:273-81
  6. A survey of bedside methods used to detect pulmonary aspiration of enteral formula in intubated tube-fed patients. Metheny NA, Myra AA, Wunderlich RJ. Am J Crit Care Med 1999 May;8(3):160-7
  7. Comparison of blue dye visualization and glucose oxidase test strip methods for detecting pulmonary aspiration of enteral feedings in intubated adults. Potts RG, Zaroukian MH, Guerrero PA, Baker CD. Chest 1993 Jan;103(1):117-21
  8. Efficacy of dye-stained enteral formula in detecting pulmonary aspiration. Metheny NA, Dahms TE, Stewart BJ, Stone KS, Edwards SJ, Defer JE, Clouse RE. Chest 2002 Jul;122(1):276-81
  9. Effect of organic synthetic food colours on mitochondrial respiration. Reyes FG, Valim MF, Vercesi AE. Food Addit Contam 1996 Jan;13(1):5-11

Back to Top