§170.315(d)(8) Integrity
| Version # | Description of Change | Version Date |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 |
Final Test Procedure |
01-08-2016
|
| 1.1 |
As of September 21, 2017, Test Procedure has been moved to Attestation/Developer self-declaration only. |
09-21-2017
|
| 1.2 |
Changed language from self-declaration to attestation |
08-25-2021
|
§ 170.315 (d)(8) Integrity—
- Create a message digest in accordance with the standard specified in §170.210(c)(2).
- Verify in accordance with the standard specified in §170.210(c)(2) upon receipt of electronically exchanged health information that such information has not been altered.
Applies to entire criterion
§ 170.210(c)(2) A hashing algorithm with a security strength equal to or greater than SHA-2 as specified by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in FIPS Publication 180-4, Secure Hash Standard, 180-4 (August 2015)
- Resource Documents
- Revision History
-
Version # Description of Change Version Date 1.0 Final Test Procedure
01-08-20161.1 As of September 21, 2017, Test Procedure has been moved to Attestation/Developer self-declaration only.
09-21-20171.2 Changed language from self-declaration to attestation
08-25-2021 - Regulation Text
-
Regulation Text
§ 170.315 (d)(8) Integrity—
- Create a message digest in accordance with the standard specified in §170.210(c)(2).
- Verify in accordance with the standard specified in §170.210(c)(2) upon receipt of electronically exchanged health information that such information has not been altered.
- Standard(s) Referenced
-
Applies to entire criterion
§ 170.210(c)(2) A hashing algorithm with a security strength equal to or greater than SHA-2 as specified by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in FIPS Publication 180-4, Secure Hash Standard, 180-4 (August 2015)
Testing components
Attestation: As of September 21, 2017, the testing approach for this criterion is satisfied by attestation.
The archived version of the Test Procedure is attached below for reference.
|
System Under Test |
ONC-ACB Verification |
|---|---|
|
The health IT developer will attest directly to the ONC-ACB to conformance with the §170.315(d)(8) Integrity requirements. |
The ONC-ACB verifies the health IT developer attests conformance to the §170.315(d)(8) Integrity requirements. |
| Version # | Description of Change | Version Date |
|---|---|---|
| 1.0 |
Initial Publication |
10-22-2015
|
| 1.1 |
Clarification added regarding hashing algorithm options. |
04-20-2016
|
§ 170.315 (d)(8) Integrity—
- Create a message digest in accordance with the standard specified in §170.210(c)(2).
- Verify in accordance with the standard specified in §170.210(c)(2) upon receipt of electronically exchanged health information that such information has not been altered.
Applies to entire criterion
§ 170.210(c)(2) A hashing algorithm with a security strength equal to or greater than SHA-2 as specified by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in FIPS Publication 180-4, Secure Hash Standard, 180-4 (August 2015)
- Resource Documents
- Revision History
-
Version # Description of Change Version Date 1.0 Initial Publication
10-22-20151.1 Clarification added regarding hashing algorithm options.
04-20-2016 - Regulation Text
-
Regulation Text
§ 170.315 (d)(8) Integrity—
- Create a message digest in accordance with the standard specified in §170.210(c)(2).
- Verify in accordance with the standard specified in §170.210(c)(2) upon receipt of electronically exchanged health information that such information has not been altered.
- Standard(s) Referenced
-
Applies to entire criterion
§ 170.210(c)(2) A hashing algorithm with a security strength equal to or greater than SHA-2 as specified by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in FIPS Publication 180-4, Secure Hash Standard, 180-4 (August 2015)
Certification Companion Guide: Integrity
This Certification Companion Guide (CCG) is an informative document designed to assist with health IT product development. The CCG is not a substitute for the 2015 Edition final regulation. It extracts key portions of the rule’s preamble and includes subsequent clarifying interpretations. To access the full context of regulatory intent please consult the 2015 Edition final rule or other included regulatory reference. The CCG is for public use and should not be sold or redistributed.
| Base EHR Definition | In Scope for CEHRT Definition | Real World Testing | USCDI | SVAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Not Included | No | No | No | No |
Quality management system (§ 170.315(g)(4)) and accessibility-centered design (§ 170.315(g)(5)) must be certified as part of the overall scope of the certificate issued to the product.
- When a single quality management system (QMS) is used, the QMS only needs to be identified once. Otherwise, the QMS’ need to be identified for every capability to which it was applied.
- When a single accessibility-centered design standard is used, the standard only needs to be identified once. Otherwise, the accessibility-centered design standards need to be identified for every capability to which they were applied; or, alternatively, the developer must state that no accessibility-centered design was used.
Quality management system (§ 170.315(g)(4)) and accessibility-centered design (§ 170.315(g)(5)) must be certified as part of the overall scope of the certificate issued to the product.
- When a single quality management system (QMS) is used, the QMS only needs to be identified once. Otherwise, the QMS’ need to be identified for every capability to which it was applied.
- When a single accessibility-centered design standard is used, the standard only needs to be identified once. Otherwise, the accessibility-centered design standards need to be identified for every capability to which they were applied; or, alternatively, the developer must state that no accessibility-centered design was used.
Applies to entire criterion
Clarifications:
- This criterion is intended to support the HIPAA Security Rule implementation specification provided at 45 CFR 164.312 (e)(2)(i) “[i]mplement security measures to ensure that electronically transmitted electronic protected health information is not improperly modified without detection until disposed of.” Because this certification criterion specifies a capability that certified health IT must include, ONC does not believe that it is necessary or appropriate to address whether hashing is applicable to public and private networks. [see also 75 FR 44620]
- Certification only ensures that a Health IT Module can create hashes using SHA-2, and it does not require the use of SHA-2. For example, users of certified health IT may find it appropriate to continue to use SHA-1 for backwards compatibility if their security risk analysis justifies the risk. [see also 80 FR 62657]
Applies to entire criterion
|
Clarifications:
|
Paragraph (d)(8)(i)
Technical outcome – The health IT can create a message digest using a hashing algorithm with security strength equal or greater than SHA-2.
Clarifications:
- A Health IT Module must demonstrate integrity protection controls for data received during an exchange (e.g., by generating a hash upon receipt of a summary record in order to ensure the integrity of the information exchanged).
Paragraph (d)(8)(i)
|
Technical outcome – The health IT can create a message digest using a hashing algorithm with security strength equal or greater than SHA-2. Clarifications:
|
Paragraph (d)(8)(ii)
Technical outcome – The health IT must be able to verify, in accordance with a hashing algorithm with security strength equal or greater than SHA-2, that information has not been altered or changed in any way.
Clarifications:
- A Health IT Module does not need to differentiate between internal and external transmissions as the capability’s subsequent use (post-certification) is at the discretion of the implementation setting’s policies. [77 FR 54251]
Paragraph (d)(8)(ii)
|
Technical outcome – The health IT must be able to verify, in accordance with a hashing algorithm with security strength equal or greater than SHA-2, that information has not been altered or changed in any way. Clarifications:
|